Support Climate State with a donation. Help to provide more quality content.


Donors can be listed as supporters, either anonymous or with their custom name/link.

Gallup: 65% of Americans Support ‘Imposing Mandatory Controls On CO2 Emissions’

prokaryotes on Wednesday, 11 April 2012. Views 5580 Posted in Climate State, Study, News

Gallup: 65% of Americans Support ‘Imposing Mandatory Controls On CO2 Emissions’

Joe Romm writes: I know you’ve heard the established wisdom: The climate bill failed in large part because it lacked public support.

That was never true, as over a dozen polls we reported on in the last 3 years make clear (seethem here and below). But that myth became popular because it suited the narrative of both the deniers and do-little centrist crowd and their enablers in the media.

 

What’s amazing is that even though essentially none of the major national “influencers” in the public arena — the President, Congress, media and so on — has been using their bully pulpit to talk about mandatory controls on carbon dioxide pollution for almost two years now, the public still supports it overwhelmingly.  A full 65% of Americans support “imposing mandatory controls on carbon dioxide emissions/other greenhouse gases.”

Here is the key chart from Gallup:

 

That’s doubly amazing because the right-wing media has never stopped its assault on climate action, ensuring that at least Tea Party crowd thinks the whole notion is absurd. Again, climate action is a classic wedge issue that separates the extreme conservatives from everyone else in the country, as many polls make clear.

Gallup wins the award for the lamest headline, “Americans Endorse Various Energy, Environment Proposals.” They don’t just bury the lede, they ignore it entirely, offering this frame instead in the sub-hed, “Republicans and Democrats show substantially differing levels of support.”

Note that even 51% of  Republicans and Republican-leaning independents still support a policy that has been vocally opposed by every GOP presidential candidate and every conservative media outlet and was the subject of carpet bombing ads during the 2010 election.

 

I’d like to get a hold of the poll’s so-called cross-tabs, but it’s typical that independents have a level of support very close to the national average. The GOP/leaners number is likely driven by the conservative Republican males, especially over 50 — the Tea Party crowd — as it is on support for clean energy in general (see yesterday’s post, “Pew Poll: Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Among Republicans“).

The great tragedy is that Obama chose to let climate action slide when there was that one brief shining moment in 2009 of both public support and progressive majorities in both houses (see “The failed presidency of Barack Obama, Part 2“).

Possibly a major push would not have succeeded, but the one thing we know for certain, is thatnot seriously trying was the sure road to failure [don't miss the classic last two lines of that video].

Related Polls:

Comments (5)

  • Rafaela

    Rafaela

    12 June 2012 at 23:03 |
    Detecting changes in a photo is poissble nowdays with proper forensics software. For examples, with site you can tell whether a photo has been Photoshopped or not. The software works by doing pattern recognition, since digital camera's tend to have specific patterns in the pictures they create. Most image manipulations will change these patterns which can be recognised. The software should even be able to give some indications what kind of manipulations have taken place.
  • Diego

    Diego

    12 June 2012 at 15:16 |
    Hi Jonathon.The arguments are very very thin and wuothit any real evidence to support them. The reasons are financial and therefore political. That and laziness.Some governments don't want to admit to it, or at least don't want to take responsibility. Mainly because most economies are built upon the trading of the Fossil Fuels etc. And if they admit to it they have to stop trading in Fuels and move to green technologies which are expensive to set up and can cause political tensions with people they purchase e.g. oil from.Many PEOPLE don't want to believe in it because:a) it's actually quite a scary idea (that the actions of people could be endangering not just other plants and animals but our very own futures);b) it means people have to stop being lazy; andc) they have to change their lifestyles. For most this seems too difficult and so they would choose to disbelieve. For some it's simply hard to change long-held ideas. And even those who DO believe will often do nothing about it because they say it's not my responsibility', why should I care', or I'll die before it gets too bad'.The biggest problem currently is the media (with the exception of the BBC who are criticised for being too supporting of current climate change being a human cause). Many stories on Climate Change will try to sow the seeds of doubt. It was strange to see (as I just watched An Inconvenient Truth on Fox Movies as it's Earth Day) Al Gore demonstrate that in 2005(?) there were over 900 scientific studies published in journals on Climate Change where there was no doubt at all that human impact is leading to the current round of Global Warming, and yet of all the Media stories published in the same year on that topic, over 50% of them tried to cast doubt on the science. When all Scientific studies HAVE to be peer-reviewed (examined by other scientists) and all of them were found to show the same thing, it's interesting the media wasn't publishing info in the same way.People that talk about mass-conspiracies are fools as there are literally tens of thousands of scientists investigating some aspect of climate change and they almost all will say the same thing.As Trevor demonstrated, the arguments are childish, illogical, insubstantiated, and wuothit any scientific evidence to support them.You have to make your own mind up where you stand on issues but please always bear this in mind: Do your own research, but research the SCIENCE using science journals and magazines and avoid the conspiracy theory sites as they will never provide the whole story only results that support their biased views. Remember, a scientist as a person may be biased and try to be misleading in his reports, but scientists as a group are unbiased and are simply looking for the truth and for a report to be published other scientists have to review it and decide if it's a good study and carried out honestly.
  • Mike Roddy

    Mike Roddy

    11 April 2012 at 05:57 |
    Koch and Tillerman have figured out that they don’t need to persuade a majority of Americans that we need to stay on the fossil fuel course. All they have to do is count on obstruction in Congress and indifference from those in the middle on this issue, and they’re home free.
    The other problem, as posters here point out, is that the Democrats are muted on this issue, and don’t call out McConnell and company for being the obvious sluts that they are. Maybe it’s because they’ve got a few ho’s in the house themselves.
  • M Tucker

    M Tucker

    11 April 2012 at 05:53 |
    We all know that the climate bill failed because it was opposed by the Republican minority in the Senate. We all know that the Republicans in congress will always support the fossil fuel industry no matter what this poll says about Republican voters. As soon as you try to include the new EPA standards for CO2 into the conversation it isn’t just the Republican legislators who suddenly go bat-s#%t; their media supporters lead the conversation. Just look at all the incredible outlandish and completely made-up fears that come from farmers and ranchers. Dust standards? Really? Maybe half of the Republican voters would like to limit GHG but they do not hold their representatives accountable. No, it is much more complicated than: President Obama didn’t try and the public really wants to do something about global climate disruption. How would President Obama have forced the Senate to vote for the House passed climate bill with a simple majority vote? A minority in the Senate can stop anything.
    Looking at the numbers, sure 51% of Republicans want to support wind, solar and alternative fuels BUT 84% want to open MORE public lands for drilling and the conservative media has been banging the ANWR drum for a long time now. Even half of the Democrats want to get at those public lands too. ‘All of the above’ is popular with all Americans.
    I know the media mostly ignores them but Henry Waxman, Nancy Pelosi and Sheldon Whitehouse have been pretty consistent on messaging and they are not alone even if it seems that way.

Leave a comment

You are commenting as guest. Optional login below.

  • Present your project, website or wisdom.
    Create
  • Connect with the world.
    Connect
  • Comment, discuss and share ideas.
    Discuss
  • Images of climate change / global warming.
    View
  • Watch climate change / global warming videos.
    Watch
  • Climate change / global warming science.
    Learn
  • Climate change / global warming related conferences.
    Participate
  • Climate change / global warming related conferences.
    Like
  • Climate State at Twitter
    Twitter